Análisis técnico a capacidades y necesidades de reemplazo de equipos que utilizan al amoniaco como refrigerante enfocado a una industria alimenticia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Esta tesis se desarrollo para una industria alimenticia de Guayaquil; la misma que corporativamente tiene desarrollado directrices a nivel global para alinearse al cumplimiento en lo definido en el Protocolo de Montreal, para poder de esta manera interactuar de forma amigable con el medio ambiente. Se realizo una descripcion del contenido del Protocolo de Montreal para conocer los acuerdos y recomendaciones en el uso de los distintos tipos de refrigerantes con sus respectivas fechas limites. Tambien, se realizo una descripcion de las areas, equipos de climatizacion y refrigeracion, y de la red de agua helada actual. Se hizo un calculo de cargas termicas tomando en cuenta cantidad de personas, lamparas o luminarias del sector, motores electricos, carga solar a traves del techo y por paredes. Se dimensionaron las redes de tuberias de agua helada, se verifico la capacidad actual de los equipos enfriadores de agua, que usan Freon R–22 de la Planta y el consumo de energia electrica actual.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".