MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156056975 · doi:10.1149/2.0681501jes

Characterization of the Mixed Oxide Layer Structure of the Ti/SnO<sub>2</sub>-Sb<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>Anode by Photoelectron Spectroscopy and Impedance Spectroscopy

2014· article· en· W2156056975 on OpenAlexafffund
Qing Ni, Donald W. Kirk, Steven J. Thorpe

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCatalytic Processes in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyDielectric spectroscopyMaterials scienceOxideTitaniumAnodeAnalytical Chemistry (journal)TinTin oxideTitanium oxideSpectroscopyChemical engineeringInorganic chemistryElectrochemistryElectrodeChemistryMetallurgyPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The in-depth chemistry of a Ti/SnO2-Sb2O5 anode was investigated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy combined with ion etching. The coating was found to be composed of multiple layers of tin and titanium oxides and composition gradients at both the oxide-air and oxide-metal interfaces. The existence of such an extensive titanium oxide layer may be related to the fabrication of the Ti/SnO2-Sb2O5 anode and subsequent inter-diffusion of species. Also, the surface tin oxide layer was found to be non-stoichiometric, which, in relation to the extensive titanium oxide structure, could be explained by a migration of oxygen toward the Ti substrate. Electrochemical tests showed that the film was unstable and continued to grow under anodic polarization. Impedance spectroscopy displayed a continuum in the dielectric relaxation time constants with depth. This variation in relaxation time constants was proposed to be caused by the continuous variation of the composition in the film.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207