MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156057829 · doi:10.2217/fnl.13.25

Polymorphisms Affecting Mirna Regulation: A New Level of Genetic Variation Affecting Disorders and Diseases of the Human Cns

2013· article· en· W2156057829 on OpenAlexaff
Reuben Saba, Stephanie A. Booth

Bibliographic record

VenueFuture Neurology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaPublic Health Agency of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSingle-nucleotide polymorphismmicroRNADiseaseBiologyGenetic associationBioinformaticsGeneGenetic variationGeneticsGenotypeMedicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recognition of people and/or populations at a high risk for the development of various types of neurological disorders and diseases is not only key to improved screening programs and earlier detection, but it also provides hope for appropriate treatment and care. Genetic alterations that change gene-expression levels have long been investigated for association with the development of pathological neurological conditions. Gene regulation by miRNAs is a relatively new area of study, and published evidence suggests that alterations in this process may be associated with increased disease risk. Here, the authors review the current data for association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and miRNA-mediated gene regulation (miR-SNPs) in human neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative diseases. Additionally, we present an approach to detect and identify functional miR-SNPs for the purpose of carrying out large-scale genetic association studies. The growing body of literature suggests that miR-SNPs are emerging as a powerful tool, both to study the pathobiology of diseases, as well as aiding in its diagnosis and prognosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.874
Threshold uncertainty score0.410

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFuture NeurologySame topicMicroRNA in disease regulationFrench-language works237,207