MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156059291 · doi:10.1093/jxb/erf017

The role of gibberellins in embryo axis development

2002· article· en· W2156059291 on OpenAlexafffund
Dirk B. Hays

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Botany · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant tissue culture and regeneration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsElongationEmbryoGibberellinBrassicaMicrosporeEmbryogenesisBotanyBiologyChemistryCell biologyUltimate tensile strengthMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The role of gibberellins (GAs) during early embryo development was examined using microspore-derived embryos (MDEs) of Brassica napus. At the globular stage of development, 10 d after initial culture (DAC) when endogenous GA(1) levels are increasing rapidly, a triazole, uniconazole, was used at 1, 33 and 100 microM to inhibit GA biosynthesis. Within this dose range there was no apparent effect of the inhibitor on embryo growth through to the early torpedo stage. However, by 25 DAC uniconazole-treated MDEs showed significantly reduced (50%) axis elongation. Addition of GA(1) at 33 microM on 14 DAC to embryos pretreated with 1 microM uniconazole on 10 DAC prevented this reduction in axis length, giving axis elongation equivalent to untreated MDEs. Application of GA(1) alone, however, did not significantly increase axis elongation. The reduced axis growth seen with uniconazole treatment was due to reduced cell elongation, but not cell number, and the co-applied GA(1) thus prevented the uniconazole-induced reduction in cell length. The elongating axis of MDEs may thus be a useful tool for examining the role of GAs in cell elongation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.150

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Experimental BotanySame topicPlant tissue culture and regenerationFrench-language works237,207