Multimode Impedance Representation of Scattering, Absorption and Extinction Cross-Sectional Areas for Plasmonic Nanoparticles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In plasmonic nanoparticles, scattering and absorption phenomena are exploited to functionalize them for various applications. Recent research in plasmonic nanoparticles has extended the classic circuit concepts to the optical domain, but under the assumption of only accounting for the fundamental mode (dipole mode) with restrictions placed on the wavelength and size of the nanoparticle. In this paper, we propose an extended approach to the impedance representation of metallic nanoparticles and develop a solution consisting of circuit elements representing their behaviour without any constraints on wavelength, size and material properties. This model offers an intuitive understanding of the qualitative behaviour of a metallic nanoparticle, and rigorously develops an all-mode (i.e.,TEm,nandTMm,nmode withm= 1 andnvarying from 1 → ∞) exact impedance model. The proposed model originates from the rigorous Mie solution. Quantities such as scattering, extinction and absorption cross-sectional areas are derived using voltages, currents and circuit elements and their equivalence is compared with well-known field solutions and full-wave simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".