Occurrence and distribution of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (<i>Ambrosia trifida</i> L.) in southwestern Ontario
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vink, J. P., Soltani, N., Robinson, D. E., Tardif, F. J., Lawton, M. B. and Sikkema, P. H. 2012. Occurrence and distribution of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed ( Ambrosia trifida L.) in southwestern Ontario. Can. J. Plant Sci. 92: 533–539. Giant ragweed is the first confirmed glyphosate-resistant (GR) weed in Canada. A survey was conducted to document the distribution of GR giant ragweed in southwestern Ontario. Giant ragweed seed was collected from 102 sites in Essex (70), Chatham-Kent (21), Lambton (10) and Waterloo counties (1) during the autumn of 2009 and 2010 prior to soybean harvest. Plants were grown in a growth room, sprayed with glyphosate at 1800 g a.e. ha −1 and classified as resistant or susceptible. GR giant ragweed has been confirmed at 47 new locations in three counties (Essex, Chatham-Kent and Lambton). The results from this survey indicate that GR giant ragweed biotypes occur across a greater area in southwestern Ontario than originally thought. This survey provides an important baseline for future surveys in the province.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".