MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156110989 · doi:10.1098/rspa.2006.1684

Enumerating the bent diagonal squares of Dr Benjamin Franklin FRS

2006· article· en· W2156110989 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Schindel, Matthew Rempel, P. D. Loly

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topicgraph theory and CDMA systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagic squareDiagonalBent molecular geometryMathematicsCombinatoricsLeast-squares function approximationNumberingBacktrackingStatisticsAlgorithmGeometryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

All 8th order Franklin bent diagonal squares with distinct elements 1, …, 64 have been constructed by an exact backtracking method. Our count of 1, 105, 920 dramatically increases the handful of known examples, and is some eight orders of magnitude less than a recent upper bound. Exactly one-third of these squares are pandiagonal, and therefore magic. Moreover, these pandiagonal Franklin squares have the same population count as the eighth order ‘complete’, or ‘most-perfect pandiagonal magic’, squares. However, while distinct, both types of squares are related by a simple transformation. The situation for other orders is also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.749
Threshold uncertainty score0.314

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesSame topicgraph theory and CDMA systemsFrench-language works237,207