Influence of automotive damper asymmetry on the kinematic and dynamic responses, and optimal damper asymmetric parameters
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper concerns the coupled effects of damper asymmetry, suspension kinematics and tyre lateral compliance on the kineto-dynamic response characteristics of a road vehicle subjected to idealised bump and pothole excitations. A quarter-car kineto-dynamic model of a road vehicle employing a double wishbone type of suspension with a strut comprising a linear spring and a two-stage asymmetric damper is formulated for the analyses. The dynamic responses to idealised bump and pothole are evaluated over a wide speed range in terms of sprung mass acceleration, suspension deflection and tyre force variations. The results revealed conflicting damper design requirements under idealised bump and pothole inputs. Optimal asymmetric damping properties are identified to realise minimal sprung mass acceleration with constrained suspension deflection under bump, pothole, and combined bump and pothole types of excitations. The optimal designs corresponding to bump and pothole excitations were found contradictory, while the solutions to combined bump and pothole excitations could yield important design guidance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it