Racial Differences Among Children With Primary Hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Race is a known risk factor for hypertension and cardiovascular disease in adults and influences blood pressure (BP) in children. We sought to determine if there are differences in clinical, laboratory, or echocardiographic characteristics among children with primary hypertension from different racial groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Study participants were 184 children aged 3 to 20 years with a diagnosis of primary hypertension who were examined at 1 of 3 participating centers at the time of initial evaluation of elevated BP. Black children were categorized as African American (AA) and nonblack children as non-AA. Comparisons were made for the entire group and after stratification according to age (<13 or ≥ 13 years). RESULTS: Overall, children categorized as AA had a higher prevalence of overweight/obesity and left ventricular hypertrophy and had higher plasma renin activity than children who were categorized as non-AA. After age stratification, these differences remained only in the children younger than 13 years old; there were no differences in these findings among children aged 13 years or older. AA children who were aged 13 years or older, however, had higher BPs for both casual and ambulatory measurements. Specifically, they had higher casual diastolic BP, higher 24-hour diastolic BP, higher daytime systolic and diastolic BP, and higher BP loads at night and over a 24-hour period compared with non-AA children who were aged 13 years or older. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that black children with primary hypertension may be at increased cardiovascular risk compared with nonblack children with primary hypertension. However, the high prevalence of overweight/obesity and left ventricular hypertrophy in all youth with primary hypertension demonstrates the need for greater preventive and therapeutic efforts aimed at reducing cardiovascular risk in this vulnerable population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".