MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156136629 · doi:10.1142/s021949880500123x

PYTHAGOREAN TRIPLES AND UNITS IN INTEGRAL GROUP RINGS

2005· article· en· W2156136629 on OpenAlexaff
Margaret Beattie, Chester Weatherby

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Algebra and Its Applications · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFinite Group Theory Research
Canadian institutionsMount Allison University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsDihedral groupGroup (periodic table)CombinatoricsHyperboloidPythagorean tripleAbelian groupNon-abelian groupCyclic groupGroup ringOrder (exchange)AutomorphismInteger (computer science)Pure mathematicsPythagorean theoremGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this note, we describe a simple method for finding units of group rings of the form Z[G] = Z[H]#Z[C 2 ] for H an abelian group, and apply this to the case G = D 4 , the dihedral group of order 8. Here, units may be described as integer points on hyperboloids, and, defining units u, v to be equivalent if they differ by an inner automorphism, we see that this equivalence relation partitions each hyperboloid into finitely many classes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Algebra and Its ApplicationsSame topicFinite Group Theory ResearchFrench-language works237,207