MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156136629 · doi:10.1142/s021949880500123x

PYTHAGOREAN TRIPLES AND UNITS IN INTEGRAL GROUP RINGS

2005· article· en· W2156136629 on OpenAlexaff
Margaret Beattie, Chester Weatherby

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Algebra and Its Applications · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFinite Group Theory Research
Canadian institutionsMount Allison University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsDihedral groupGroup (periodic table)CombinatoricsHyperboloidPythagorean tripleAbelian groupNon-abelian groupCyclic groupGroup ringOrder (exchange)AutomorphismInteger (computer science)Pure mathematicsPythagorean theoremGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this note, we describe a simple method for finding units of group rings of the form Z[G] = Z[H]#Z[C2] for H an abelian group, and apply this to the case G = D4, the dihedral group of order 8. Here, units may be described as integer points on hyperboloids, and, defining units u, v to be equivalent if they differ by an inner automorphism, we see that this equivalence relation partitions each hyperboloid into finitely many classes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Algebra and Its ApplicationsSame topicFinite Group Theory ResearchFrench-language works237,207