A multimedia on-line assistance system with safe remote control of applications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper tackles the problem of efficiently helping software end users. Assistance to end users has become increasingly critical to the productivity of organizations. The cost of a person or a group of people that provides assistance is substantial. Besides, safety and confidentiality of end-user information are often compromised when assistance is provided. Remote assistance using remote control and visualization software is one of the means to efficiently provide assistance to end users. Several software systems have been proposed to take the control of remote computers and applications, but few of them take into account human aspects and guarantee security and confidentiality of information. Consideration of these elements is necessary for practical remote resolution of problems. Using concepts from the field of groupware and remote control of computers, we have devised software to provide remote assistance to end users while insuring security and confidentiality of information as well as providing the tools required for natural human interaction. This paper presents our software.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it