MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

POSITIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF FATTY ACIDS IN EGG YOLK LIPIDS

2006· article· en· W2156170754 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Food Lipids · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFatty Acid Research and Health
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryYolkPolyunsaturated fatty acidLipaseDocosahexaenoic acidPancreatic lipaseBiochemistryFatty acidPhospholipaseChromatographyEnzymeFood science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Numerous methods for the assessment of the positional distribution of fatty acids (FAs) in triacylglycerols (TGs) and phospholipids (PLs) have been described in the literature. Most of them employ enzymatic reactions or chiral separation by high‐performance liquid chromatography. Compared with most other food lipids, egg lipid has a rather unique composition, containing high amounts of TG as well as PL organized in lipoproteins. In this study, we demonstrate that the classical approach employing pancreatic lipase and phospholipase A2 is suitable for application to egg lipids. By using this method, the total distribution of FAs among the single positions of the main lipid classes in egg lipids can be measured in a rather straightforward way. Problems regarding accuracy, especially for the determination of minor and polyunsaturated fatty acids, are discussed. The presented method gave satisfactory results even for polyunsaturates such as docosahexaenoic acid down to amounts of 1% in a specific position.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.308
Threshold uncertainty score0.458

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it