MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156241340 · doi:10.1002/humu.9523

The<i>MLH1</i>variants p.Arg265Cys and p.Lys618Ala affect protein stability while p.Leu749Gln affects heterodimer formation

2008· article· en· W2156241340 on OpenAlexafffund
Sheron Perera, Bharati Bapat

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Mutation · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsPMS2BiologyMissense mutationMLH1GeneticsDNA mismatch repairGermlineGeneMSH2Germline mutationLynch syndromeMutationDNA repair

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Germline mutations in the mismatch repair genes lead to the Lynch syndrome/ HNPCC, and genetic testing is offered to identify individuals at risk of developing this disease. About a third of all genetic alterations detected in the mismatch repair gene MutL homolog 1 (MLH1) are missense variants. The majority of these variants are of equivocal clinical significance. In this report, we investigate the molecular basis of the pathogenicity of three missense variants localized to distinct functional domains. Our results demonstrate that the MLH1 variants p.Arg265Cys (c.793C>T) and p.Lys618Ala (c.1852_1853AA>GC) significantly decrease the stability of the protein, while another missense variant p.Leu749Gln (c.2246T>A) is able to compromise heterodimerization of the MLH1-PMS2 complex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.683
Threshold uncertainty score0.578

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman MutationSame topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancerFrench-language works237,207