Les parlers acadiens : un continuum discontinu
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nous partons de l'hypothèse que les variétés du français acadien, éloignées les unes des autres en Amérique du Nord depuis longtemps, constitueraient un continuum interlinguistique par l'espace structurel qui les sépare. En plus, toutes les variétés de l'acadien font preuve d'un haut degré de variabilité interne. À partir d'une analyse des restructurations dans quelques sous-systèmes grammaticaux (les propositions conditionnelles, les formes verbales non finies) et de quelques discontinuités par rapport à la présence ou l'absence de certains traits caractéristiques de l'acadien, nous tirons la conclusion que l'espace variationnel acadien se présente comme un exemple complexe de continuités et de discontinuités auquel le modèle scalaire ne peut être appliqué que partiellement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".