MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156266161 · doi:10.1148/radiol.13112310

Intracranial Vasa Vasorum: Insights and Implications for Imaging

2013· review· en· W2156266161 on OpenAlexaff
Anthony Portanova, Niloofar Hakakian, David J. Mikulis, Renu Virmani, Wael Abdalla, Bruce A. Wasserman

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiology · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVasa vasorumMedicineVasculitisRadiologyPathologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This review offers insight into the possible role of vasa vasorum in the development of intracranial vascular disease. Unique structural features of intracranial vessels and nourishment from the surrounding cerebrospinal fluid environment may account for the relative lack of intracranial vasa vasorum early in life. However, with advancing age and with the development of vascular disease, vasa vasorum are known to develop. Advanced contrast material-enhanced imaging techniques are capable of helping detect and even grade intracranial vasa vasorum, and this may provide new insights into our ability to diagnose and assess the risk of intracranial vascular lesions such as atherosclerosis, aneurysms, dissections, and vasculitis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.751

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations188
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRadiologySame topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery DiseasesFrench-language works237,207