MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156276760

Wavelet-based relative prefix sum methods for range sum queries in data cubes

2002· article· en· W2156276760 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Management and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersUniversity of TorontoAcadia University
KeywordsPrefixComputer scienceRange (aeronautics)WaveletCube (algebra)AlgorithmCombinatoricsMathematicsData miningArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data mining and related applications often rely on extensive range sum queries and thus, it is important for these queries to scale well. Range sum queries in data cubes can be achieved in time O(1) using prefix sum aggregates but prefix sum update costs are proportional to the size of the data cube O(n^d). Using the Relative Prefix Sum (RPS) method, the update costs can be reduced to the root of the size of the data cube O(n^d/2). We present a new family of base b wavelet algorithms further reducing the update costs to O(n^d/B) for B as large as we want while preserving constant-time queries. We also show that this approach leads to O(log^d n) query and update methods twice as fast as Haar-based methods. Moreover, since these new methods are pyramidal, they provide incrementally improving estimates. *Best Paper Award at CASCON2002*

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.856
Threshold uncertainty score0.493

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it