MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156309319 · doi:10.1210/en.2006-0444

Activin Inhibits the Human Pit-1 Gene Promoter through the p38 Kinase Pathway in a Smad-Independent Manner

2006· article· en· W2156309319 on OpenAlexafffund
Chantal de Guise, Annie Lacerte, Shahrzad Rafiei, Rachel Reynaud, Mélanie Roy, Thierry Brue, Jean-Jacques Lebrun

Bibliographic record

VenueEndocrinology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicTGF-β signaling in diseases
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityRoyal Victoria Hospital
FundersMcGill University Health CentreMcGill University
KeywordsACVR2BActivin type 2 receptorsSMADEndocrinologyBiologyInternal medicineProlactin cellSignal transductionProlactinActivin receptorTGF beta signaling pathwayCell biologyTranscription factorTransforming growth factorGeneHormoneMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The pituitary transcription factor Pit-1 regulates hormonal production from the anterior pituitary gland. However, the mechanisms by which Pit-1 gene expression is regulated in humans are poorly understood. Activin, a member of the TGFbeta superfamily, acts as a negative regulator of cell growth and prolactin gene expression in lactotrope cells. In this study, we show that activin negatively regulates the human Pit-1 gene promoter. We defined a 117-bp element within the Pit-1 promoter that is sufficient to relay these inhibitory effects. We further investigated the signaling pathways that mediate activin-induced inhibition of Pit-1 gene promoter in pituitary lactotrope cells. We found that the activin effects on Pit-1 gene regulation are Smad independent and require the p38 MAPK pathway. Specifically, blocking p38 kinase activity reverses activin-mediated inhibition of the Pit-1 gene promoter. Together, our results highlight the p38 MAPK pathway as a key regulator of activin function in pituitary lactotrope cells and further emphasizes the critical role played by activin in regulating hormonal production in the pituitary gland.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.612

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEndocrinologySame topicTGF-β signaling in diseasesFrench-language works237,207