MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156336268 · doi:10.1109/bibm.2008.20

Images Based System for Surface Matching in Macromolecular Screening

2008· article· en· W2156336268 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Processing and 3D Reconstruction
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversità degli Studi di Milano
KeywordsMatching (statistics)Representation (politics)Computer scienceContext (archaeology)Surface (topology)In silicoPattern matchingArtificial intelligenceTheoretical computer scienceBiological systemMathematicsBiologyGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Computer vision technologies of structure matching based on surface representation have demonstrated their effectiveness in many research fields. In particular they can be successfully applied to in silico studies of molecular biology. Protein activities, in fact, are driven by their external characteristics, therefore the ability to match surfaces allows one to quickly infer information about possible interactions and functions of biological components.In this work we present a surface matching algorithm which is able to screen possible macromolecular interactions in terms of surface complementarities. The main characteristics of the algorithm is the exploitation of an intermediate level of data representation for 3D surfaces based on images of local description. This approach enables the matching of small pieces of surfaces, which is a crucial aspect when working in the biological context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.669
Threshold uncertainty score0.297

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage Processing and 3D ReconstructionFrench-language works237,207