Introduction: objectifs et méthode de recherche de la conduite institutionnelle de sécurité
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les institutions internationales de sécurité (IIS) importent considérablement aux puissances majeures même si ces dernières ne révèlent pas leur intérêt également en tout temps et en tout lieu. Cet article établit la problématique d'un projet de recherche à deux phases dont le but est d'expliquer pourquoi et dans quelles conditions six puissances majeures et une puissance moyenne ont recouru aux us durant la période immédiate succédant à la fin de la guerre froide. Il identifie les conditions de l'élaboration théorique de ce recours, les objectifs et la stratégie de recherche, ainsi que l'emploi d'une méthode comparative de quatorze cas différents au cours desquels ces puissances ont agi, ou auraient pu agir, à travers les us.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.060 | 0.105 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".