MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156356619 · doi:10.1086/339131

Abundances of Deuterium, Nitrogen, and Oxygen toward HZ 43A: Results from the <i>FUSE</i> Mission

2002· article· en· W2156356619 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLine-of-sightSpectral lineIonizationLine (geometry)White dwarfUltravioletAbsorption spectroscopyUltraviolet astronomyCosmochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present an analysis of interstellar absorption along the line of sight to the nearby white dwarf star HZ 43A. The distance to this star is 68 ± 13 pc, and the line of sight extends toward the north Galactic pole. Column densities of O I, N I, and N II were derived from spectra obtained by the Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer ( FUSE ), the column density of D I was derived from a combination of our FUSE spectra and an archival Hubble Space Telescope ( HST ) GHRS spectrum, and the column density of H I was derived from a combination of the GHRS spectrum and values derived from Extreme Ultraviolet Explorer ( EUVE ) data obtained from the literature. We find the following abundance ratios (with 2 σ uncertainties): D /H = (1.66 ± 0.28) × 10 -5 , O /H = (3.63 ± 0.84) × 10 -4 , and N /H = (3.80 ± 0.74) × 10 -5 . The N II column density was slightly greater than that of N I, indicating that ionization corrections are important when deriving nitrogen abundances. Other interstellar species detected along the line of sight were C II, C III, O VI, Si II, Ar I, Mg II, and Fe II; an upper limit was determined for N III. No elements other than H I were detected in the stellar photosphere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement SeriesSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207