MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156363271 · doi:10.1109/imtc.2005.1604519

Data Fusion Architecture - An FPGA Implementation

2006· article· en· W2156363271 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2005 IEEE Instrumentationand Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKalman filterSensor fusionCovariance matrixComputer scienceCorrelation coefficientFast Kalman filterWeightingExtended Kalman filterCovariance intersectionNoise (video)Invariant extended Kalman filterFilter (signal processing)Artificial intelligenceControl theory (sociology)AlgorithmComputer visionMachine learningAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Architecture for multisensor data fusion based on adaptive Kalman filter is described. The architecture uses several sensors that measure same quantity and each is fed to Kalman filter. For each Kalman filter a correlation coefficient between the measured data and predicted output was used as an indication of the quality of the performance of the Kalman filter. Based on the values of the correlation coefficient an adjustment to the measurement noise covariance matrix (R) was made using fuzzy logic technique. Predicted outputs obtained from Kalman filters were fused together based on weighting coefficient, which was also obtained from the correlation coefficient. Results of fusing data of several sensors showed better results than using individual sensor. Matrix-matrix multiplication using FPGA also presented

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.562
Threshold uncertainty score0.941

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it