Meet In the Middle Cross-Layer Adaptation for Audiovisual Content Delivery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes a new architecture and implementation of an adaptive streaming system (e.g., television over IP, video on demand) based on cross-layer interactions. At the center of the proposed architecture is the meet in the middle concept involving both bottom-up and top-down cross layer interactions. Each streaming session is entirely controlled at the RTP layer where we maintain a rich context that centralizes the collection of (i) instantaneous network conditions measured at the underlying layers (i.e.: link, network, and transport layers) and (ii) user- and terminal-triggered events that impose new real-time QoS adaptation strategies. Thus, each active multimedia session is tied to a broad range of parameters, which enable it to coordinate the QoS adaptation throughout the protocol layers and thus eliminating the overhead and preventing counter-productiveness among separate mechanisms implemented at different layers. The MPEG-21 framework is used to provide a common support for implementing and managing the end-to-end QoS of audio/video streams. Performance evaluations using peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity index (SSIM) objective video quality metrics show the benefits of using the proposed Meet In the Middle cross-layer design compared to traditional media delivery approaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".