MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156369401 · doi:10.1149/1.2398725

Sodium Carboxymethyl Cellulose

2006· article· en· W2156369401 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectrochemical and Solid-State Letters · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicConducting polymers and applications
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarboxymethyl celluloseMaterials sciencePolyvinylidene fluorideElectrodeComposite materialStyrene-butadienePolymerCelluloseStyreneSodiumChemical engineeringCopolymerMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electrochemical performance of negative electrodes based on commercially available crystalline Si powder and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) binder was investigated. Compared to the conventional binder, polyvinylidene fluoride, Si electrodes using CMC binder show vastly improved cycling performance. A high specific capacity of about for has been achieved with a lower cutoff potential of vs . Si electrodes made using CMC binder have better capacity retention than those using a binder consisting of CMC and styrene butadiene rubber. CMC is an extremely stiff and brittle polymer, so it is surprising that it functions well as a binder in electrodes where the volume change of the active material particles is about 100%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.511

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it