MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156373206

Single-strand conformational polymorphism and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis in screening for variegate porphyria: identification of two new mutations.

2002· article· en· W2156373206 on OpenAlexaff
James G. Donnelly, Sarah A. Detombe, J. Hindmarsh

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPorphyrin Metabolism and Disorders
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemperature gradient gel electrophoresisProtoporphyrinogen oxidaseMolecular biologyPolymorphism (computer science)PorphyriaExonGel electrophoresisGeneBiologygenomic DNAGeneticsSingle-strand conformation polymorphismPolyacrylamide gel electrophoresisPoint mutationMutationGenotypeBiochemistryEnzymeEndocrinology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Single-strand conformational polymorphism and denaturing gel electrophoresis were used to screen for mutations in the protoporphyrinogen oxidase gene (PPOX) of three patients with clinically and biochemically proven variegate porphyria in order to select genomic regions for specific DNA sequence analysis. Two previously undescribed mutations were identified: PPOX1423-1426-delATCT and PPOX2272insG. Denaturing gel electrophoresis was able to discern the point mutation in exon 5 (PPOX2272insG) of the PPOX gene. Once an index individual has been identified, single-strand conformational polymorphism and denaturing gel electrophoresis techniques are useful to identify family members who may be unaffected carriers. Such identification can help potential cases to avoid medications and other triggers that could precipitate acute porphyric attacks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicPorphyrin Metabolism and DisordersFrench-language works237,207