MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156374460 · doi:10.1109/tac.2007.899090

Performance Analysis of Second-Order Sliding-Mode Control Systems With Fast Actuators

2007· article· en· W2156374460 on OpenAlexaff
Igor Boiko, Leonid Fridman, Alessandro Pisano, Elio Usai

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsHoneywell (Canada)University of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Robustness (evolution)ActuatorInvariant (physics)CascadeQuadratic equationSliding mode controlMathematicsRobust controlApplied mathematicsControl systemComputer sciencePhysicsEngineeringNonlinear systemArtificial intelligenceControl (management)Geometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The robustness of the second-order sliding-mode control (2-SMC) algorithm known as the "generalized sub-optimal" algorithm is analyzed with respect to the cascade introduction of a linear fast actuator. It is shown that if the actuator dynamics are sufficiently fast then the system trajectories converge to an invariant set that includes the second-order sliding domain s = s' = 0. It is also shown that the size of the invariant set has quadratic dependence with respect to the actuator "small parameter" mu for the sliding variable s, and linear dependence for its derivative s. This means that in the steady state the system trajectories converge to an invariant domain described by the following conditions: |s| les O(mu2) and |s| les O(mu). A simulation example is given to confirm the proposed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Automatic ControlSame topicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsFrench-language works237,207