MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156374460 · doi:10.1109/tac.2007.899090

Performance Analysis of Second-Order Sliding-Mode Control Systems With Fast Actuators

2007· article· en· W2156374460 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsHoneywell (Canada)University of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Robustness (evolution)ActuatorInvariant (physics)CascadeQuadratic equationSliding mode controlMathematicsRobust controlApplied mathematicsControl systemComputer sciencePhysicsEngineeringNonlinear systemArtificial intelligenceControl (management)Geometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The robustness of the second-order sliding-mode control (2-SMC) algorithm known as the "generalized sub-optimal" algorithm is analyzed with respect to the cascade introduction of a linear fast actuator. It is shown that if the actuator dynamics are sufficiently fast then the system trajectories converge to an invariant set that includes the second-order sliding domain s = s' = 0. It is also shown that the size of the invariant set has quadratic dependence with respect to the actuator "small parameter" mu for the sliding variable s, and linear dependence for its derivative s. This means that in the steady state the system trajectories converge to an invariant domain described by the following conditions: |s| les O(mu <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> ) and |s| les O(mu). A simulation example is given to confirm the proposed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.716
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it