MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156422508 · doi:10.1139/h03-034

Two Years of Resistance Training in Older Men and Women: The Effects of Three Years of Detraining on the Retention of Dynamic Strength

2003· article· en· W2156422508 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Applied Physiology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBench pressStrength trainingPhysical therapyResistance trainingMuscle strengthAnimal scienceDemographyGerontologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dynamic muscle strength (1-RM) and symptom-limited treadmill endurance were compared among three groups (5 M and 5 F per group) of older adults (mean age 72.5 yrs) who had either weight-trained continuously twice per week for 5 years (Tr), ceased to weight train after 2 years (Detr), or acted as controls throughout (Con). The Tr and Detr trained hard (progressing up to 3 sets at up to 80% of 1-RM) for 2 years; the Tr continued training for an additional 3 years at a maintenance level (2 to 3 sets at 60-70% 1-RM), whereas the Detr stopped training for those 3 years. The Con subjects did not train for the duration of the study but took part in identical testing procedures. After 2 years of resistance training, dynamic strength in the Tr and Detr groups increased significantly above baseline and Con values for all exercises, p < 0.0001. Following 3 years of maintenance level training, arm curl, leg press, and bench press 1-RM (sum of both limbs) in the Tr remained significantly above baseline values (21.6 kg = 17%; 15.7 kg = 82%; 8.3 kg = 34%, respectively). The 1-RM in Detr were 18.4 kg (14%), 5.3 kg (24%), and 1.4 kg (9%) above baseline for leg press, arm curl, and bench press after 5 years, whereas the Con declined over the 5-yr period by 18.4 kg (-9.7%), 4.4 kg (-19%), and 3.5 kg (-6%), respectively. There were nonsignificant improvements in treadmill performance in the Tr and Detr, and a decline in the Con after 2 years. Treadmill performance declined between Years 2 and 5 in all groups despite continued training (ns). We conclude that: (1) dynamic strength gains from 2 years of resistance training in older individuals are not entirely lost even after 3 years of detering; (2) these effects may be specific to the exercises performed in the training program; (3) adoption of maintenance-level moderate-intensity training significantly attenuates the decline in dynamic strength of previously trained muscles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.186

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it