MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156434347 · doi:10.1002/pssb.200945126

Fission processes following core level excitation in <i>closo</i> ‐1,2‐orthocarborane

2009· article· en· W2156434347 on OpenAlex
E. Rühl, Adam P. Hitchcock, John D. Bozek, T. Tyliszczak, A. L. D. Kilcoyne, David N. McIlroy, Axel Knop‐Gericke, P. A. Dowben

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuephysica status solidi (b) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBoron Compounds in Chemistry
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsFragmentation (computing)ExcitationFissionIonAtomic physicsChemistryCoincidenceIonic bondingSpectroscopySpectral lineNuclear physicsPhysicsNeutron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Time‐of‐flight mass analysis with multi‐stop coincidence detection was used to study the multi‐cation ionic fragmentation of the closo carborane cage molecule closo ‐1,2‐orthocarborane (C 2 B 10 H 12 ) following inner‐shell excitation in or above the B 1s regime. Electron ion coincidence spectra reveal the cationic products which are formed after core level excitation. Distinct changes in fragmentation pattern are observed as a function of excitation energy. Photoelectron–photoion–photoion coincidence (PEPIPICO) spectroscopy was used to study the dominant fission routes in the core level excitation regime. Series of ion pairs are identified, where asymmetric fission dominates, leading to ion pairs of different mass. Suitable fission and fragmentation mechanisms are discussed. (© 2009 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.355
Threshold uncertainty score0.949

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it