MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156451528 · doi:10.1109/icnn.1996.548897

On MISE convergence rates of radial basis functions networks

2002· article· en· W2156451528 on OpenAlex
A. Krzyiak, H. Niemann

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN'96) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
KeywordsConvergence (economics)Radial basis functionRate of convergenceRadial basis function networkBasis (linear algebra)MathematicsApplied mathematicsMean squared errorComputer scienceMathematical optimizationAlgorithmArtificial neural networkArtificial intelligenceStatisticsTelecommunicationsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate mean integrated squared error (MISE) convergence and the rate of convergence of a class of RBF networks. This paper extends L/sub 2/ convergence results for radial basis nets given in Xu, Krzyzak and Yuille (1994). We obtain tighter bounds and under milder conditions for MISE than those obtained previously for L/sub 2/ error.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it