MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156454775 · doi:10.7202/000518ar

Comment comme fonctionne d’une génération à l’autre*

2003· article· fr· W2156454775 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Gisèle Chevalier

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue québécoise de linguistique · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLinguistic Variation and Morphology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nous ne disposons pas des données nécessaires pour déterminer si l’intensification et la diversification des emplois de comme dans le parler des adolescents au Canada français est une vogue passagère ou si on est témoin d’un changement sensible du fonctionnement des marqueurs d’approximation. Nous traçons le profil de l’emploi de comme dans des corpus d’entrevues auprès d’adolescents et d’adultes de la communauté francophone du Sud-Est du Nouveau-Brunswick du point de vue de l’intensité de son utilisation, de sa distribution dans la conversation, des fonctions qu’il remplit et de sa position dans l’énoncé. Cette étude empirique soulève des questions à approfondir sur l’évolution des comportements langagiers intra- et intergénérationnels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2003
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue québécoise de linguistiqueSame topicLinguistic Variation and MorphologyFrench-language works237,207