MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156457596 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2003.1279907

Characterization of architectural distortion in mammograms

2004· article· en· W2156457596 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligencePixelReceiver operating characteristicMammographyDistortion (music)Computer visionOrientation (vector space)Pattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceRegion of interestMathematicsMedicineBandwidth (computing)GeometryBreast cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a technique to characterize architectural distortion in mammograms based upon oriented texture analysis. The local texture orientation is computed for all pixels in a region of interest (ROI), thus obtaining the corresponding orientation field. The orientation fields are then analyzed using phase portraits. Six features are extracted from the phase portraits, and a quadratic discriminant classifier is used to classify the ROIs as a site of architectural distortion or other breast parenchymal pattern. The methods were tested with 37 ROIs: 15 with architectural distortion, eight with spiculated malignant tumors, two with malignant calcifications, and 12 with normal parenchymal patterns. The results obtained indicated a sensitivity of 80%, a specificity of 80%, and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.86.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.689
Threshold uncertainty score0.115

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it