MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156490398 · doi:10.1109/icassp.1998.678054

Adaptive thresholding for detection of nonsignificant vectors in noisy image sequences

2002· article· en· W2156490398 on OpenAlexaff
L. Martel, A. Zaccarin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMotion estimationArtificial intelligenceThresholdingMotion vectorComputer scienceMotion fieldComputer visionNoise (video)Quarter-pixel motionEntropy (arrow of time)Pattern recognition (psychology)Block (permutation group theory)Optical flowMathematicsAlgorithmImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In noisy image sequences, block matching motion estimation generates erroneous motion vectors since the algorithm tries to correlate noise. We present an adaptive threshold test to detect blocks for which only nonsignificant motion vectors can be estimated. Vectors of these blocks are then assigned the zero vector before any block motion estimation is performed. By nonsignificant, we refer to motion vectors of nonmoving areas as well as vectors of moving areas for which the noise level is too high to allow a good estimation of the motion. The detection of these vectors reduces the computational complexity of the BMA and the entropy of the motion field. The algorithm is embedded in a hierarchical BMA and takes advantage of their different spectral characteristics to discriminate between the frame difference energy due to noise and due to motion. The algorithm is also efficient for low noise sequences where it can be used to initialize a segmentation of moving objects from the background.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.821
Threshold uncertainty score0.227

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207