MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156503121 · doi:10.1017/s0009840x10000181

<i>Prior Analytics</i> 1 - Striker (G.) (ed., trans.) Aristotle. Prior Analytics <i>Book I</i>. Pp. xx + 268. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2009. Cased, £50 (Paper, £19.99). ISBN: 978-0-19-925040-0 (978-0-19-925041-7 pbk).

2010· article· en· W2156503121 on OpenAlexaff
Paolo C. Biondi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Classical Review · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicClassical Philosophy and Thought
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SudburyLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnalyticsHistoryMedia studiesData scienceSociologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prior Analytics 1 - Striker (G.) (ed., trans.) Aristotle. Prior Analytics Book I. Pp. xx + 268. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2009. Cased, £50 (Paper, £19.99). ISBN: 978-0-19-925040-0 (978-0-19-925041-7 pbk). - Volume 60 Issue 2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.280
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Classical ReviewSame topicClassical Philosophy and ThoughtFrench-language works237,207