MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156528782

지하공공보도시설내 지하도상가의 용도지침 설정

2007· article· ko· W2156528782 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
이강주

Bibliographic record

Venue대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계 · 2007
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Safety, and Science Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmenityOpenness to experienceOrder (exchange)GeographyComputer scienceBusinessPsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper aims to extract and present some reasonal and practical guidelines which are helpful to use determination and its organization of underground passage shops in Korea. To do this several researches are executed as follows. Firstly, define the public nature in underground public pedestrian facilities and set out some use determination principles-openness, amenity and image. Secondly, selection of cases. Canada and Japan are very advanced countries in developing underground commercial spaces with wide and systematic. Corresponding with Korean situation and well-designed cases are selected in these two countries to survey and analyse. Thirdly, survey of cases. Through literature, internet, and site visiting investigations, the physical characteristics and the use related contents of cases are examined. Fourthly, analysis of cases. In order to obtain objective and concrete results, an analytical framework is established. And the cases of Canada and Japan were analysed by it. Lastly, suggestion of use and its organizational ratio. On the basis of the results of analysis, to apply to underground passage shops in Korea, the proper uses and their appropriate organizational ratio are suggested.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.499
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계Same topicEducation, Safety, and Science StudiesFrench-language works237,207