MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156572949 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2008.917691

Channel Estimation and Simulation of an Indoor Power-Line Network via a Recursive Time-Domain Solution

2008· article· en· W2156572949 on OpenAlexaff
Xin Ding, Julian Meng

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Line Communications and Noise
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChannel (broadcasting)Line (geometry)Power (physics)Time domainFrequency domainElectronic engineeringElectric power transmissionTree (set theory)Compensation (psychology)Tree networkComputer sciencePower-line communicationTopology (electrical circuits)Network topologyControl theory (sociology)AlgorithmEngineeringMathematicsElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsTime complexity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The frequency-selective characteristics of a power-line channel is a result of the tree-like structure of the power-line network and the various loads connected to its termination points. Channel modeling is important for the estimation and compensation of the degradation suffered by the signal propagating over power lines, and is also the basis for channel simulation. Based on the previously proposed time-domain models, the authors present a new method to efficiently calculate a power-line channel's frequency response. With the knowledge about the power-line network's topology and cable characteristics, this algorithm utilizes simple but effective recursive matrix operations to accurately estimate the channel response of a particular power-line network. This method can be used to estimate the frequency response of any point-to-point channel in a power-line network, and can also be exploited as a channel simulation tool which provides a remarkably realistic description of a power-line channel. The effectiveness of the proposed algorithm is demonstrated by comparing the estimated and measured responses of two example power-line networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.612
Threshold uncertainty score0.869

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power DeliverySame topicPower Line Communications and NoiseFrench-language works237,207