Investigation of a passive inter-limb device on step-to-step transition of human walking
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In walking like an inverted pendulum, the step-to-step transition period requires a substantial amount of simultaneous positive and negative mechanical work to redirect the center of mass between steps and it was considered as a major determinant of gait in terms of metabolic expenditure. In the current study, we developed a passive inter-limb device that transfers energy between the legs during the step-to-step transition period. By effectively transferring the energy dissipated at heel-strike from the leading leg to the trailing leg which is performing push-off, we hypothesize that the mechanical cost of transport (COT) will be reduced. Consequently, the lower limb muscles are required to do less positive and negative work, resulting in a reduced metabolic COT. Data from five subjects walking at 1.2m/s on an instrumented treadmill with the device active and passive was collected. It was found that the mechanical COT during the step-to-step transition period was reduced when walking with the device active. However, contrary to our hypothesis the metabolic COT increased when walking with the device active.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".