MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156642994 · doi:10.1109/tasl.2009.2038556

Broadband Source Localization From an Eigenanalysis Perspective

2009· article· en· W2156642994 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBeamformingCross-correlationMicrophoneParameterized complexityAlgorithmMicrophone arrayBroadbandFunction (biology)Eigenvalues and eigenvectorsGeneralizationRangingAcoustic source localizationSpeech recognitionAcousticsMathematicsTelecommunicationsPhysicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Broadband source localization has several applications ranging from automatic video camera steering to target signal tracking and enhancement through beamforming. Consequently, there has been a considerable amount of effort to develop reliable methods for accurate localization over the last few decades. Essentially, the localization process consists in finding the candidate source location that maximizes the synchrony between the properly time-shifted microphone outputs. In addition to using well known cross-correlation-based criteria such as the steered response power (SRP), minimum variance (MV), and multichannel cross-correlation (MCCC), this synchrony can also be measured using the averaged magnitude difference function (AMDF) and the averaged magnitude sum function (AMSF) whose calculations involve low computational cost. In earlier related works, the latter techniques have been used for time delay estimation (TDE) of a target source observed by only one pair of microphones. Their generalization to the multiple microphone case and application to source localization have not been studied yet. In this paper, we consider both categories, i.e., cross-correlation and AMDF (with AMSF)-based approaches, using an arbitrary number of microphones, and analyze their performance. Specifically, we first provide a unifying study of the most popular cross-correlation-based techniques, such as the SRP, MV, and MCCC. In this paper, we use the eigenanalysis of the parameterized spatial correlation matrix (PSCM) to classify these methods and gain some insight into their performance. We demonstrate, for instance, that the MV and SRP consist in searching the major eigenvalue of the PSCM, while the MCCC, essentially, combines its minor eigenvalues when scanning for the source location. Inspired by this analysis, we show, in the second part of this work, the efficiency of the AMDF and AMSF in localizing an acoustic source using multiple microphones. Indeed, we propose two new parameterized matrices named as the parameterized averaged magnitude difference matrix (PAMDM) and the parameterized averaged magnitude sum matrix (PAMSM). The eigenanalysis of these matrices also reveals new criteria for acoustic source localization. Simulation results are provided to illustrate the effectiveness of all the investigated and proposed methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score0.964

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it