The colonization of maize seedling roots and rhizosphere by Fusarium spp. in Mississippi in two soil types under conventional tillage and notillage systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pioneer 3167 hybrid maize was planted on two soil types in Mississippi on four dates annually from 1995 to 1997 and was sampled at weekly intervals beginning one week and ending 4 weeks after planting. Plots were either tilled with a do-all and rows formed in the fall or were left undisturbed until planting in the spring. Under tillage, Fusarium spp. were isolated most frequently at the earliest and latest planting dates when seedlings were sampled at 10 and 17 days. In no-tillage plots, the overall isolation frequency was lower than in conventional-tillage plots and decreased with later planting dates and sampling times. The highest Fusarium populations were found in the rhizosphere of a silt loam in conventional-tillage plots when seedlings were sampled 28 days after the second planting in 1997, compared to populations from a silty clay soil. Fusarium moniliforme, F. solani and F. oxysporum were the predominant Fusarium spp. isolated from maize seedling roots. In pathogenicity tests, F. moniliforme and F. solani produced measurable effects on maize seedlings. F. moniliforme reduced the length of primary roots and decreased the number of secondary roots, and F. solani reduced root dry weight of maize seedlings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".