MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156789527 · doi:10.1093/rpd/ncr443

Rapid determination of 226Ra in urine samples

2012· article· en· W2156789527 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiation Protection Dosimetry · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicRadioactivity and Radon Measurements
Canadian institutionsHealth CanadaAtomic Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrineChromatographyChemistryMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new radiochemical separation method has been developed for rapid analysis of (226)Ra in urine samples. In this method, radium is separated from urine matrix using cation and anion exchange column chromatography. A (224)Ra tracer is added, together with its parent in the (228)Th standard, for chemical recovery correction. After separation, the sample is precipitated with hydrous titanium oxide and then prepared for counting by creating a thin-layer counting source using BaSO(4) micro-precipitation. The radium isotopes are then counted by alpha spectrometry. Replicate spike and blank samples were analysed for validation of the procedure. The detection limit was determined to be 0.22 Bq l(-1) with 4 h of counting for 20 ml of urine sample. Using this method, the results can be reported within an 8 h turn-around time. This method is suitable for quick dose assessment of (226)Ra exposure following a radiation emergency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.349
Threshold uncertainty score0.587

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it