MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156808783 · doi:10.1093/occmed/kqu070

Dr Lachlan Grant (1871-1945)

2014· article· en· W2156808783 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
James Douglas, Annie Tindley, Alastair Smyth

Bibliographic record

VenueOccupational Medicine · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHistory of Medical Practice
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dr Lachlan Grant practised as a doctor in the rural community of Ballachulish, Scotland for over 40 years. His substantial contribution over a professional life time as a general practitioner (GP), medical scientist and occupational physician has recently come to the attention of social historians researching his political contribution as a social reformer [1]. After gaining a medical degree at the University of Edinburgh and despite a promising career in research and teaching, he dedicated his professional life to rural general practice [2]. He developed an early interest in tuberculosis and established a laboratory service for accurate diagnosis. His multitude of publications in the Lancet and British Medical Journal made frequent reference to the importance of laboratory medical science, especially in a rural context [3–5]. He returned to the family home in Ballachulish in the late 1890s as a medical employee of the slate quarry and was tasked with looking after slate quarry workers and their families [6,7]. Grant was an ardent writer on social reform, land reform, nationalization and economic development. He campaigned for social justice for agricultural workers and crofters inaugurating the Highland Crofters and Cottars Association in 1906, along trade union lines [8]. He also campaigned nationally against economic migration to Canada and New Zealand which he felt was taking the best young people from his community [9]. In the mid-1930s, Grant published his ideas about Highland development in a seminal pamphlet, A New Deal for the Highlands [10]. When British Aluminium established a plant at Kinlochleven, he became the company medical officer (1930). Grant’s experience in occupational health, including challenging his employer over health and safety issues and considering the balance of employment opportunities and health impacts from new industries, remains relevant today [11,12]. In 1912, the British government was so concerned about poor medical services in the Highlands and Islands that they commissioned a report by Sir John Dewar, MP for Inverness-shire. Grant gave crucial evidence to this committee, which stands out in its analytical ability and visionary thinking. He advocated a state-funded and organized health service and mapped out an organizational framework and professional governance structure that we recognize today in the National Health Service (NHS) [13]. The Highlands and Islands Medical Service was established in 1913 [14]. It piloted the concept of a state health care system in the UK and the service administrator Miss Muriel Ritson served on the Beveridge Commission in the early 1940s. It was the Beveridge Report, published in 1942, which set out the concept of the NHS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.189
Threshold uncertainty score0.633

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1890.062

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOccupational MedicineSame topicHistory of Medical PracticeFrench-language works237,207