Simulation and Thermodynamic Analysis of a Two-Stage Organic Rankine Cycle for Utilisation of Waste Heat at Medium and Low Temperature Levels
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A two-stage ORC process is proposed as a technical option for utilising waste heat from power generation processes in combustion engines, and specifically as an efficient means of increasing the total efficiency of energy conversion in existing and projected biogas plant. Due to process-related factors, the utilisation of waste heat in the exhaust gas heat exchanger and from the cooling system of the combustion engine is performed at different temperature levels and is realised in the ORC process in two stages by means of a micro-turbine and a screw engine. In the course of the research work conducted, a complex calculation and simulation program was designed and created with which thermodynamic analysis as well as, to some degree, operational analysis of the respective processes were carried out.The novelty of the concept developed here consists in adapting the framing conditions of a two-stage ORC process to the demands posed by utilizing the waste heat of biogas plants and to the practical application possibilities with respect to pressure ratios and temperature levels of expansion machines. The concept has been thermodynamically investigated and the results form the basis for constructing a test installation which shall enable the verification of these theoretical results. Key words: Low temperature energy use; Organic rankine cycle; Two-stage process
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it