Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fluctuations in Middle Wisconsinan environments are recorded in high resolution proxy climatic curves derived from magnetic susceptibility profiling of central Alaskan loess. Two intervals of low wind intensity and climatic amelioration, separated by a period of somewhat higher wind intensity, can be recognized in several loess records of the Middle Wisconsinan. Radiocarbon dates from loess in the Fox Permafrost Tunnel indicate that the culmination of the later period of low wind intensity occurred ca. 30-32.000 yr BP, and was associated with thermal degradation of permafrost. An older period of low wind intensity early in the Middle Wisconsinan, ca. 50-60,000 yr BP, is correlative with a fossil wood horizon in the permafrost tunnel and a widespread paleosol in loess sections. Warm intervals of similar age are recorded in the Grande Pile pollen record, in ice cores and in marines cores. The 30-32,000 yr BP and the 50-60,000 yr BP warm events recorded in Alaskan loess sequences may have been caused by "greenhouse" warming produced by transient increases in atmospheric CO2 as recorded in the Vostok ice core. A Middle Wisconsinan interval of higher wind intensity, associated with the development of ice wedges, may reflect climatic cooling due to low atmospheric CO2 values ca. 42,000 yr BP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".