Ab initio investigation of potential energy curves of the 23 electronic states of IBr correlating to neutral<sup>2</sup>P atoms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Potential energy surfaces for all Born-Oppenheimer electronic states of IBr molecule correlating to the neutral (2)P ((2)P(3/2) and (2)P(1/2)) iodine and bromine are calculated for the first time. Electric dipole and polarizability curves (static and transition) are also determined. Calculations include scalar and spin-orbit relativistic effects within all-electron Douglas-Kroll two-component Hamiltonian. Electron correlation is treated with quasi-degenerate multi-reference second-order perturbation theory. Seven adiabatic electronic states (X (1)Sigma(+), A'(3)Pi(2), A (3)Pi(1), 1 (3)Pi(0-), B (3)Pi(0+), B'(3)Sigma, and 2 (3)Pi(0+)) exhibit significant covalent bonding, and can support vibrational states. Calculated spectroscopic parameters agree with experiment to better than 1000 cm(-1) (T(e)), 10 cm(-1) (omega(e)), and 0.05 Angstrom (r(e)). A new 1 (3)Pi(0-) state correlating to ground-state atoms is predicted at T(e) approximately 14 000 cm(-1), omega(e) approximately 80 cm(-1), and r(e) approximately 3.0 Angstrom. The second new state (2 (3)Pi(0+)) correlates to excited iodine atom, with T(e) approximately 20 000 cm(-1), omega(e) approximately 115 cm(-1), and r(e) approximately 3.3 Angstrom. Non-adiabatic coupling parameters are calculated for the four avoided crossings, which arise due to electronic spin-orbit interaction. Estimated parameters of the B (3)Pi(0+)/B'(3)Sigma crossing (R(c) approximately 3.32 Angstrom; V approximately 120 cm(-1)) agree with experimental values. The previously unsuspected 2 (3)Pi(0-)/1 (1)Sigma(-) crossing of two repulsive surfaces provides a new collisional deactivation channel for Br* atoms at relative velocities above 1000 m s(-1). Several repulsive states (including 1 (1)Pi(1) and 2 (3)Pi(1)) intersect the B/B' system near the avoided crossing point, and may affect dynamics of IBr in strong laser fields.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".