MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156835112 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450820413

A Bench‐Scale Study of Conditioning Behaviour in Oil Sands Slurries

2004· article· en· W2156835112 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
W. I. Friesen, Tadeusz Dąbroś, Teddy Kwon

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsSyncrude (Canada)Devon Energy (Canada)Natural Resources Canada
FundersChina Electronics Technology Group CorporationSyncrude
KeywordsSlurryConditioningAsphaltMixing (physics)Oil sandsMaterials scienceExtraction (chemistry)Environmental scienceGeotechnical engineeringGeologyComposite materialChemistryChromatographyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Proper conditioning of an oil sand/water slurry is essential for the efficient extraction of bitumen. The conditioning process depends on such variables as ore grade, temperature, mixing intensity, mixing time, and water composition. A technique has been developed in which a microscope and video cameras are used to observe a slurry stirred in a glass cell to evaluate, on a comparative basis, the effect of conditioning parameters on bitumen recovery. Several ores and their blends were studied and found to exhibit large differences in their conditioning behaviour. The method offers the capability of diagnosing ore processability problems and optimizing slurry conditioning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207