Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using data from a large, nationally representative U.S. survey, the authors examine differences in adult caregiving responsibilities, working conditions, and caregiver outcomes by gender, ethnicity, immigration status, and educational attainment. Women, Hispanics, and first-generation immigrant caregivers are more likely to have worse working conditions including an unsupportive culture at work, less schedule flexibility, and less access to paid vacation leave. Women and first-generation immigrant caregivers are more likely to report caregiving contributing to poor job outcomes including quitting work, retiring early, or reducing hours involuntarily. Caregivers with less than a college degree experience both worse working conditions including lack of access to paid sick days and worse job outcomes including having lost wages or a job. Women, second-generation immigrants, and those with a high school diploma or less are more likely to report that their caregiving responsibilities interfere with their quality of life including negative impacts on their ability to spend time with friends. Research and policy implications are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it