Les premiers immigrants et la prononciation du français au Québec
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À la conception largement répandue dans le grand public que «l’accent» québécois reflète surtout les usages linguistiques des dialectes ruraux des provinces d’origine des colons du xvii e siècle, on opposera ici une analyse des traits de prononciation qui caractérisent cet accent. Ce sont surtout la prononciation des mots outils, les valeurs spécifiques des allophones, la base d’articulation, la prosodie et l’intonation qui établissent les caractéristiques phonétiques dominantes d’un «accent» particulier. Celles-ci sont cependant très fluctuantes au cours de l’histoire et peuvent difficilement être rapportées aux usages anciens. Seules les distributions des distinctions phonémiques suffisamment fréquentes permettent des comparaisons historiques. Dans presque tous les cas, l’usage québécois moderne reflète les usages parisiens — souvent ceux de la norme — du xvii e siècle, plutôt que les patois ou les français de l’Ouest de la France.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it