Joint multiregion segmentation and parametric estimation of image motion by basis function representation and level set evolution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate a variational method for joint segmentation and parametric estimation of image motion by basis function representation of motion and level set evolution. The functional contains three terms. One term is of classic regularization to bias the solution toward a segmentation with smooth boundaries. A second term biases the solution toward a segmentation with boundaries which coincide with motion discontinuities, following a description of motion discontinuities by a function of the image spatio-temporal variations. The third term refers to region information and measures conformity of the parametric representation of the motion of each region of segmentation to the image spatio-temporal variations. The components of motion in each region of segmentation are represented as functions in a space generated by a set of basis functions. The coefficients of the motion components considered combinations of the basis functions are the parameters of representation. The necessary conditions for a minimum of the functional, which are derived taking into consideration the dependence of the motion parameters on segmentation, lead to an algorithm which condenses to concurrent curve evolution, implemented via level sets, and estimation of the parameters by least squares within each region of segmentation. The algorithm and its implementation are verified on synthetic and real images using a basis of cosine transforms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".