MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156971118 · doi:10.1093/jxb/erg254

Isolation and characterization of a Brassica napus cDNA corresponding to a B-class floral development gene

2003· article· en· W2156971118 on OpenAlexaff
Jeffrey D. Pylatuik

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Botany · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Molecular Biology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersUniversity of Utah
KeywordsBiologyHomeotic geneGynoeciumPetalStamenMeristemComplementary DNAArabidopsis thalianaBotanyMADS-boxBrassicaAgamousWhorl (mollusc)PrimordiumRapid amplification of cDNA endsBractGeneticsGeneInflorescenceMutantArabidopsisMolecular cloningPollen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

B-class floral homeotic genes are required for the proper formation and identity of petals and stamens in dicot flowers. A partial cDNA clone encoding a B-class gene, BnAP3 (Brassica napus APETALA3), was isolated from a B. napus cDNA library derived from young inflorescence meristems. The 5' region of the cDNA was retrieved by RACE. The deduced amino acid sequence of the full-length clone exhibited high similarity to APETALA3 of Arabidopsis thaliana and functionally homologous proteins from other species. 5' RACE and Southern analysis suggests that BnAP3 has multiple alleles in B. napus. Expression analysis assayed by RT-PCR shows that BnAP3 is expressed in floral tissues, as well as non-floral tissues such as root and bract. Transformation of wild-type A. thaliana and B. napus plants with BnAP3 under the control of a promoter specific to reproductive organs converts carpels to stamens, while the expression of this construct in A. thaliana plants mutant for AP3 restores the development of third-whorl stamens in addition to directing a carpel to stamen conversion in the fourth whorl.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.137

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Experimental BotanySame topicPlant Molecular Biology ResearchFrench-language works237,207