MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156986184 · doi:10.1109/aps.2010.5561265

Removal of beam squint in series fed array antennas using abnormal group delay phase shifters

2010· article· en· W2156986184 on OpenAlexaff
S. Keser, Mo Mojahedi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroup delay and phase delayPhase shift moduleTrue time delayBeam (structure)Series (stratigraphy)Phase (matter)ResonatorAntenna (radio)OpticsPhysicsReflective array antennaBeam steeringDirectional antennaComputer scienceElectrical engineeringPhased arrayTelecommunicationsInsertion lossEngineeringSlot antennaFilter (signal processing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the concept of beam squint in series-fed linear array antennas is discussed. A new unit cell with both zero group delay and zero phase delay is proposed. Moreover, a Negative Refractive Index (NRI) TL are additionally loaded with lossy resonators to provide the desired NGD, thereby compensating the positive group delay of the initial NRI-TL. Such TL when used as inter-element phase shifter in a series-fed linear array antenna will greatly reduce the beam squint.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.419
Threshold uncertainty score0.434

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207