MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2157042316 · doi:10.1017/s0022112003005524

Double-diffusive and Soret-induced convection in a shallow horizontal porous layer

2003· article· en· W2157042316 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Mechanics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMechanicsBuoyancyDouble diffusive convectionConvectionNatural convectionAdiabatic processThermophoresisMass fluxCombined forced and natural convectionPorous mediumMaterials scienceLinear stabilityThermodynamicsRayleigh numberPorosityPhysicsHeat transferInstability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reports an analytical and numerical study of the natural convection in a horizontal porous layer filled with a binary fluid. A uniform heat flux is applied to the horizontal walls while the vertical walls are impermeable and adiabatic. The solutal buoyancy forces are assumed to be induced either by the imposition of constant fluxes of mass on the horizontal walls (double-diffusive convection, $a\,{=}\,0$ ) or by temperature gradients (Soret effects, $a\,{=}\,1$ ). The governing parameters for the problem are the thermal Rayleigh number, $R_T$ , the Lewis number, $Le$ , the solutal Rayleigh number, $R_S$ , the aspect ratio of the cavity, $A$ , the normalized porosity of the porous medium, $\varepsilon$ , and the constant $a$ . The onset of convection in the layer is studied using a linear stability analysis. The thresholds for finite-amplitude, oscillatory and monotonic convection instabilities are determined in terms of the governing parameters. For convection in an infinite layer, an analytical solution of the steady form of the governing equations is obtained by assuming parallel flow in the core of the cavity. The critical Rayleigh numbers for the onset of supercritical, $R_{\hbox{\scriptsize\it TC}}^{\hbox{\scriptsize\it sup}}$ , or subcritical, $R_{\hbox{\scriptsize\it TC}}^{\hbox{\scriptsize\it sub}}$ , convection are predicted by the present theory. A linear stability analysis of the parallel flow pattern is conducted in order to predict the thresholds for Hopf bifurcation. Numerical solutions of the full governing equations are obtained for a wide range of the governing parameters. A good agreement is observed between the analytical prediction and the numerical simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.585

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it