Reaction of a Particle Suspension in a Rapidly‐Heated Oxidizing Gas
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The reaction of a suspension of solid particles in a rapidly‐heated oxidizing gas is relevant to metalized explosives and propellants, as well as to combustion of solid fuel‐particle suspensions in premixed‐gaseous‐fuel clouds encountered in accidents within the mining and process industries. A simplified model is considered, using a constant‐volume approximation, which assumes that non‐volatile particles react heterogeneously via a one‐step surface reaction. The resulting unified particle reaction rate includes both kinetic and diffusive reaction resistances. It is shown that the onset of the chemical reaction in a rapidly heated particulate suspension may occur by two different physical mechanisms. The first mechanism, realized in a dilute suspension of particles, is defined by the ignition of a single particle, i.e., by the critical phenomenon associated with the rapid transition from a kinetically‐ to diffusively‐limited reaction regime. The second mechanism dominates the reaction onset in a dense particulate suspension and occurs in a similar manner to the reaction onset in a rapidly‐heated homogeneous gas mixture, where the highly‐activated reaction occurs in an explosion‐like manner after some time delay and preheating. Unlike the single particle ignition phenomenon, the second mechanism lacks criticality and is not limited to particles above a certain size. The interplay between these two reaction‐onset mechanisms leads to a nontrivial dependence of the total reaction time on the particle size and solid‐fuel concentration within the suspension.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it